Skip to content

The Kurtz Firm - Intellectual Property and Corporate Transaction Law Firm

Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Corporate Transactions - Big Firm Experience Without The Overhead
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Pay Invoice

Examiner Resolved Indefiniteness

February 8, 2022 richardkurtz

In Nature Simulation Systems Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc., No. 2020-2257 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2022), the Federal Circuit reversed the…

Continue Reading →

CAFC Favors Patentee Vectura Affirming $90 Million Judgment

December 9, 2020 richardkurtz

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered its decision in Vectura Limited v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC on November 19,…

Continue Reading →

International Patent Exhaustion Case Gets Cert to Supreme Court

December 6, 2016 richardkurtz

On December 2, 016, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the Federal Circuit’s decision in Impression Products, Inc., v. Lexmark…

Continue Reading →

Federal Circuit Determines that Invention ‘Incidental to’ Financial Activity Does Not Give Rise To CBM Review at U.S. Patent Office

December 1, 2016 richardkurtz

On November 21, 2016, the Federal Circuit determined that a claimed invention that is “incidental to” or “complementary to” a…

Continue Reading →

USPTO Finds That “Publically Accessible” Requirement for Prior Art Was Not Met for Documents Made Available at Members-Only Meeting

November 18, 2016 richardkurtz

On October 26, 2016, the PTAB concluded in an IPR filed by GoPro, Inc. against Contour IP Holding LLC that the plaintiff…

Continue Reading →

Filed under: Patent

Contact Us

  • contact@kurtzfirm.com
  • 407-956-4119

Join Our Newsletter

Sign up to receive intellectual property news in your inbox.


  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Pay Invoice
Copyright © 2025 The Kurtz Firm - Intellectual Property and Corporate Transaction Law Firm — Primer theme by GoDaddy